DISCLAIMER

Search This Blog

Loading...

Sunday, February 19, 2012

FirstEnergy Corp.'s decision to close its small Ohio coal power plants could lead to soaring power prices


FirstEnergy Corp.'s decision to close its small Ohio coal power plants could lead to soaring power prices

Published: Thursday, February 16, 2012, 7:00 AM     Updated: Thursday, February 16, 2012, 10:43 AM
FirstEnergy Plant ClosingsView full sizeThe stacks from the FirstEnergy Corp. coal-fired power plant are seen rising above a row of homes in Eastlake. FirstEnergy Corp. says it will shut down six older, coal-fired power plants in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland, affecting about 530 employees on Sept. 1. The Akron, Ohio-based utility said Thursday that the move is related to new environmental rules.
CLEVELAND, Ohio -- FirstEnergy Corp.'srecent decision to shut down four smaller, coal-burning power plants has sparked a storm of speculation that electric rates here could soar within three years.
The company has dismissed the conjecture as Wall Street chatter by analysts hoping the company's stock prices will move up along with the price of power.
FirstEnergy's power plants have not run regularly for some time and generate only a small percentage of FirstEnergy's total output, so the talk of price spikes has seemed improbable and premature.
Also, FirstEnergy now owns additional power plants in Pennsylvania that it plans to modify to generate additional power - electricity that in theory could flow west into Ohio.
The common sense analysis would conclude that the loss of the small power plants would have little effect.
But the in the arcane world of deregulation, Internet-based auctions determine power prices, and they don't necessarily make common sense.
Conducted under federally authorized rules, the auctions not only determine power prices but also the cost of building additional power plants, if needed. By federal rules, the industry must maintain a reserve capacity to generate a level of extra power that is 15 percent above the demand during peak use days, such as a hot day in August.
The issue is whether FirstEnergy's decision to close rather than upgrade its old plants to meet new Environmental Protection Agency rules might tip the balance between demand and supply.
The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio is concerned enough to have intervened in a case well under way before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission that could have a huge bearing on what Ohio consumers will pay because of a supply shortage.
The case was filed last year by PJM Interconnection, the private company that controls power flows over much of the East Coast and now Ohio as well.
PJM has asked the FERC for authority to change the rules about how it determines whether a region has enough power plants and how money should be raised to build new power plants.
The outcome of the case could affect a special PJM auction set for May - and end up costing Ohio rate payers hundreds of millions of dollars in new charges. The auction is not directly about power prices.
Its purpose is to determine how much electricity will be needed three years in the future, June 1, 2015, and then determine through bidding how much it would cost to build additional power plants or additional transmission lines to import power into Ohio, if it is needed.
Some analysts have called the auction "contrived," and its has forced New Jersey into a federal court battle with PJM over the process.
Every power supplier, whether it is a utility or just a middle man that buys power wholesale and sells it to customers, has to pay a share of that cost to build additional plants, based on how much power it sells.
PJM collects those fees and distributes them back to power plant owners.
The extra costs would show up in the bids at the next auction for power itself, experts say, and then in customer bills.
FirstEnergy spokesmen maintain that predicting what power prices will be a couple of years in the future is just too speculative.
"It's simply not possible to predict an auction price, whether for a car, an antique or electricalgeneration," said spokesman Todd Schneider.
Predicting the outcome of May's capacity auction is just as difficult, analysts say.
But because existing transmission lines in and out of Ohio are already pretty busy and because other Ohio utilities are joining PJM, it is pretty clear to some analysts that prices in the May capacity auction probably will be higher than today.
"I do believe prices are likely to rise from last year's level in PJM West (western Pennsylvania and Ohio), because American Electric Power and Duke Power of Ohio are joining PJM," said Hugh Wynne, senior analyst with Bernstein Research in New York.
Wynne said AEP will be 2,000 megawatts short of power. He said Duke is also closing a large power plant.
The PUCO fears that the result could be that PJM will treat FirstEnergy's Ohio territory as an island as far as reserve generation capacity - ultimately making power much more expensive here.
"The planned retirement of about 2,200 megawatts of generation in the FirstEnergy zone and the formation of a separate pricing zone could have a dramatic effect on electric prices for Ohio consumers in FirstEnergy's region," PUCO's lawyers wrote in their petition to the FERC

Friday, February 10, 2012

First Solar shares plunge on project delay


Click here to find out more!

First Solar shares plunge on project delay

Posted: Feb 10, 2012 11:28 AM PSTUpdated: Feb 10, 2012 2:41 PM PST
By JONATHAN FAHEY
AP Energy Writer
NEW YORK (AP) - First Solar is warning that a construction delay threatens to undo its sale of a large solar project planned for Los Angeles County to power producer Exelon Corp.
The company said in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday that it has been unable to resolve a construction permit issue. That is blocking the distribution of funds from a federal loan guarantee to help pay for the construction of the project.
First Solar shares fell by $5.12, or 10.4%, to close at $43.91 Friday.
First Solar sold the project to Exelon for $75 million in September. Under terms of the sale, First Solar must buy the project back from Exelon if funding for the loan does not come through.
First Solar said it has until Feb. 24 to resolve the issue and receive funding.
First Solar also said that if it were forced to buy back the project it would still have enough cash to fund its business while it looked for another buyer.
First Solar is 1 of the world's largest makers of solar panels. Panel prices have fallen sharply in recent years as raw materials have gotten cheaper, a surge of new panel factories were built in Asia and demand from Europe, the world's biggest solar market, has waned.
In response to falling prices, First Solar has expanded its solar development business, which benefited from low panel prices.
First Solar is developing and building several large solar farms in California and the Southwest. It typically sells the projects to large power producers that then market and sell the electricity generated by the panels.
First Solar announced in September that it had received a loan guarantee from the Department of Energy of up to $646 million to help pay for construction of the project, a 230-megawatt farm in northern Los Angeles County called Antelope Valley Solar Ranch One.
Jonathan Fahey can be reached at http://twitter.com/JonathanFahey .
Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Thursday, January 26, 2012

ACEEE: MASSACHUSETTS OVERTAKES CALIFORNIA AS #1 ENERGY EFFICIENCY STATE, MICHIGAN AND ILLINOIS AMONG THE MOST IMPROVED

<><> <><> <><> <><> <><> <><> <><> <><> <><> <><>

<><> <><> <><> <><>

logo
 

<><> <><> <><> <><>

ACEEE: MASSACHUSETTS OVERTAKES CALIFORNIA AS #1 ENERGY EFFICIENCY STATE, MICHIGAN AND ILLINOIS AMONG THE MOST IMPROVED



2011 Energy Scorecard Top 10 Also Includes NY, OR, VT, WA, RI, MN, CT, MD; States Most in Need of Improvement Are: ND, WY, MS, KS, OK, SC, WV, MO, AL, and SD ... While MI, IL, NE, TN, AL and MD Are Six Most Improved States.



WASHINGTON, D.C. (October 20, 2011): A sour U.S. economy, tight state budgets, and a failure by Congress to adopt a comprehensive energy strategy have not slowed the growing momentum among U.S. states toward increased energy efficiency, according to the fifth edition of the annual ACEEE State Energy Efficiency Scorecard released today by the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE) during a National Press Club news conference.



Available online at http://aceee.org/research-report/e115, the ACEEE Scorecard shows that the top 10 states are: Massachusetts (taking the #1 position for the first time); California (slipping from the top spot it held for the first four editions of the ACEEE Scorecard); New York State; Oregon; Vermont; Washington State; Rhode Island; Minnesota, Connecticut; and Maryland (making its first appearance in the top 10 and also one of the six most improved states in the 2011 ACEEE Scorecard).



The 10 states most in need of improvement (from dead last to #42) are: North Dakota; Wyoming; Mississippi; Kansas; Oklahoma; South Carolina; West Virginia; Missouri; Alabama (also one of the top six most improved states); and South Dakota.



The six most improved states include Michigan, Illinois, Nebraska, Alabama, Maryland, and Tennessee.



"Energy efficiency is America's abundant, untapped energy resource and the states continue to press forward to reap its economic and environmental benefits," said ACEEE Executive Director Steven Nadel. "The message here is that energy efficiency is a pragmatic, bipartisan solution that political leaders from both sides of the aisle can support. As they have over the past decades, states continue to provide the leadership needed to forge an energy-efficient economy, which reduces energy costs, spurs job growth, and benefits the environment."



"Thanks to our investments in innovation and infrastructure, Massachusetts is now leading the nation in energy efficiency," said Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick. "Through our Green Communities Act, we set aggressive goals and laid the foundation for greater investment in energy efficiency -- and now we are proud to be a model for the nation and world."



"I am thrilled that Maryland is being recognized as one of the top ten states and one of the most improved states for energy efficiency," said Malcolm Woolf, director of the Maryland Energy Administration. "As a result of Governor O'Malley's vision in establishing one of the nation's most aggressive energy efficiency goals, Marylanders have already saved over 700,000 MWh of electricity and over $91 million dollars since 2009, and our peak demand program has helped us avoid major blackouts during our record-setting summer heat wave."



"Illinois is a purposeful leader in the area of sustainability, investing more than $600 million in energy efficiency projects over the last four years alone," Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity Director Warren Ribley said. "By supporting aggressive policies including the state's energy efficiency portfolio standard and advanced building industry training and education, we are creating jobs, building more sustainable communities and securing our place in the new energy economy."



"We are excited that Michigan's positive action on energy efficiency is being recognized nationally," said Valerie Brader, the chief energy policy officer for the Michigan Economic Development Corporation. The ACEEE report observed that Michigan's improvement is particularly due to the implementation of energy efficiency programs advanced in state legislation P.A. 295.



The fifth edition of the ACEEE State Energy Efficiency Scorecard presents a comprehensive ranking of the states based on an array of metrics that capture best practices and recognize leadership in energy efficiency policy and program implementation. The Scorecard benchmarks progress and provides a roadmap for states to advance energy efficiency in the residential, commercial, industrial, and transportation sectors. A new, diverse set of states has followed a group of leading states by adopting significant energy efficiency policies, which will lead to innovative and effective programs. Tremendous potential remains for energy efficiency savings in all of the states should motivate decision-makers to advance energy efficiency.



"Clearly, 2011 has not been kind to our economy, but energy efficiency remains a growth sector that attracts investment and creates jobs," said Michael Sciortino, ACEEE senior policy analyst and the report's lead author. "With even higher energy savings possible, we expect leading states to continue pushing the envelope next year and inspire those at the bottom of the rankings to embrace energy efficiency as a core strategy to gain a competitive advantage by generating cost-savings, promoting technological innovation, and stimulating growth."

OTHER KEY FINDINGS




Facing uncertain economic times, states are continuing to use energy efficiency as a key strategy to generate cost-savings, promote technological innovation, and stimulate growth. The ACEEE Scorecard documents the following trends:



  • Total budgets for electricity efficiency programs increased to $4.5 billion in 2010, up from $3.4 billion in 2009. Combined with natural gas program budgets of about $1 billion, total energy efficiency budgets in 2010 equal about $5.5 billion. Given the increasing regulatory commitments to energy efficiency, this growth will likely continue over the next decade.

  • Twenty-nine (29) states have either adopted or have made significant progress toward the adoption of the latest energy-saving building codes for homes and commercial properties - up from twenty in 2010 and ten in 2009.

  • Twenty-four (24) states have adopted an Energy Efficiency Resource Standard (EERS), which sets long-term energy savings targets and drives utility-sector investments in energy efficiency programs. States that adopted EERS policies in 2007 and 2008 are now realizing significant energy savings and moving ahead in the Scorecard rankings.

  • States continue to improve policies to reduce financial, technical, and regulatory barriers to adoption and deployment of combined heat and power (CHP) systems, which generate electricity and thermal energy in an integrated system. Tremendous potential remains for CHP, particularly in states with heavy industrial and manufacturing bases.

  • A group of leading states remains ahead of the curve in adopting policies to reduce vehicle miles traveled and promote the purchase and manufacture of efficient vehicles. A major gap exists, however, as over half the states have minimal or no policies to encourage efficiency in the transportation sector.

Methodology


This ACEEE Scorecard provides a comprehensive assessment of policy and programs that improve energy efficiency in our homes, businesses, industry, and transportation sectors. The Scorecard examines six state energy efficiency policy areas and presents these results in six chapters: (1) utility and public benefits programs and policies; (2) transportation policies; (3) building energy codes; (4) combined heat and power; (5) state government initiatives; and (6) appliance efficiency standards. States can earn up to 50 possible points in these six policy areas combined, with the maximum possible points in each area weighted by the magnitude of its potential energy savings impact.



ABOUT ACEEE



The American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy acts as a catalyst to advance energy efficiency policies, programs, technologies, investments, and behaviors. For information about ACEEE and its programs, publications, and conferences, visit www.aceee.org.



MEDIA CONTACT:   Patrick Mitchell at (703) 276-3266 or pmitchell@hastingsgroup.com.



EDITOR'S NOTE: A streaming audio replay of the news event will be available at http://www.hastingsgroupmedia.com/aceee/102011ScorecardReport.mp3, an electronic copy of the ACEEE 2011 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard report and a high-resolution image of the ACEEE "logo" will be made available upon request on October 20, 2011.





                                                       

                                         

Saturday, December 10, 2011

Atlantis flicks switch on giant 1MW tidal turbine


Atlantis flicks switch on giant 1MW tidal turbine

New AR1000 device to be tested in waters off Orkney for two years

15 Aug 2011
Scotland's first grid-connected, commercial-scale tidal turbine came online last week when Atlantis Resources Corporation flicked the switch on its AR1000 device at the European Marine Energy Centre (EMEC) in Orkney.
The 1MW capacity, three-blade turbine stands 22.5 metres high and has an 18 metre rotor diameter, making it one of the largest marine turbines ever built.
It will be tested for two years in the waters off Orkney before being deployed in Scotland's Pentland Firth.
Atlantis has a 10 per cent stake inMeyGen, a joint venture with International Power and investment bank Morgan Stanley, which won the right to develop the Inner Sound site in October last year.

Tim Cornelius, Atlantis chief executive, said that the deployment of the AR1000 represents the culmination of a long development process, including fine-tuning the nacelle from its earlier two-rotor, AK1000 turbine.
"Our business enters the next phase of its evolution in great shape and I want to thank the huge ecosystem of technology partners, suppliers, contractors and industry figureheads who have supported us to date," Cornelius said in a statement.
"We will continue to invest in the AK1000 research and development programme as the supply chain matures, but our customers need commercial reliability and that's what the AR1000 system can give them today."
The AK1000 will soon be joined at EMEC by rival developer Aquamarine Power's Oyster 800. The 800kW wave energy device, which was unveiled last month, is set to be far more efficient that its 315kW predecessor, and Aquamarine plans to fit two more devices off the coast of Orkney in 2012 and 2013.
All three Oysters will eventually form a 2.4MW array linked to an onshore hydro-electric plant, the company said.
The west of Scotland could also see a further marine energy boost after Argyll and Bute council revealed that it is bidding for £20m of government funds to develop the town of Oban as a renewable energy hub.
Council leader Dick Walsh told The Scotsman today that discussions are already underway with renewable energy industry and government representatives, adding that ScottishPower's proposed Argyll Array wind farm off the coast makes Oban the ideal location for a west coast service centre.